FAL Review: Century Arms International L1A1 ReceiverFAL Review: Century Arms International L1A1 ReceiverFAL Review: Century Arms International L1A1 Receiverars-website-header-perpixel
  • Home
  • Armory
    • FAL & L1A1 Armory
    • FAL & L1A1 Price List
    • What’s this 922 stuff?
    • Refinishing
    • METACOL Tech Specs
  • Store
    • Custom Work
    • FAL
      • FAL Barrel Group
      • FAL Receiver Group
      • FAL Lower Group
      • Parts Kits & Receivers
    • L1A1
      • L1A1 Barrel Group
      • L1A1 Receiver Group
      • L1A1 Lower Group
      • Parts Kits & Receivers
    • FAL Israel
      • FAL Israel Barrel Group
      • FAL Israel Receiver Group
      • FAL Israel Lower Group
    • FAL India
      • FAL Indian Barrel Group
      • FAL Indian Receiver Group
      • FAL Indian Lower Group
    • FAL Paratrooper
    • FAL Misc Tools and Parts
    • Bargain Bin
      • Misc Guns, Parts, Closeouts
    • Misc
      • Books, T-Shirts, Promos
      • Pay Invoice
  • Resources
    • FAL
      • Aust. L1A1 Serial Number Lookup
      • FAL Reviews – Receivers
        • CAI L1A1 Receiver
        • FAC FAL Receiver
        • Coonan FAL Receiver 2009
        • WAC FAL Receiver – Steel
        • WAC FAL Receiver – Aluminum
        • EAI FAL Receiver
        • EAI FAL Receiver 2007-2008
        • EAI L1A1 Receiver 2009
        • Olympic Arms FAL Receiver
      • FAL Reviews – DSA
        • Defective DSA Barrels
      • FAL Tutorials
        • Rhodesian Pattern Camouflage
        • CAI L1A1 Thumbhole Restoration
        • FNC Handguards on FAL
        • Fake Wood L1A1 Handguards
        • Convert Type A Lower to Type B
        • FAL Magazine Repair
        • FAL Tutorial: Installing FAL Israel Gas Block
      • FAL Reviews – Misc
        • FAL India Parts ID
        • Gas Block Drilling Fixture
    • AK
      • ORF Gen 2 Galil Receiver
      • ORF Gen 1 Galil Receiver
      • PKM Tripod A&D
      • RPD A&D
      • AK Pistol Build
      • IMI Galil Build
      • Saiga Sporter AK Conversion
      • Arsenal AK Trigger Adjustment
      • TAPCO G2 AK Trigger Adjustment
    • HK
      • HK vs POF Parts Comparison
      • Special Weapons SW5
      • PTR-91 HK Build
      • SW3 HK Build
    • SCAR
      • SCAR Review: FN SCAR-16S & SCAR-17S.
      • SCAR 20 Initial Impressions
    • Refinishing
      • Firearm Metal Finishing
      • Firearm Wood Finishing
    • Tools
      • East German AK Armorer Tools
      • East German Makarov Tools
      • Chinese Armorer Tools
      • ARS Armorer Tools
      • Gunsmith Tool Holder
      • Gunsmith Workbench
    • Misc Tutorials
      • Beretta AR-70 Build
      • Browning 1919 Build
    • Misc Reviews
      • Gunplumber Makes Spears
      • Individual Combat Load
      • Czech Vz52 Rifle A&D
      • 20g Shotgun for Home Defense
      • Fine Scale Models
      • ARS Ghillie Suits
      • Best Gun Evaluation
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • About ARS
    • Gunplumber
    • The Shop
    • ARS on Facebook
    • ARS on YouTube
    • FAL/L1A1 FaceBook User Group
Account0
FAL Review: Entréprise Arms Inc. FAL Receiver
2016-09-20
Tool Tutorial: Building a Gunsmith Tool Holder
2016-09-29

FAL Review: Century Arms International L1A1 Receiver

(updated 04-09-2020)
Introduction
Century Arms International makes a cast FAL receiver that was included both on complete rifles and available by itself. Its primary attraction was its comparatively low cost – about 30% less than an import before the receiver-import ban, and now perhaps an even lower comparative price.
Review

CAI FAL receiver review
Receiver is finish-machined from a casting. Although of unknown metal type, I have no reason to suspect the steel or the heat treatment is inadequate. The hundreds of complaints I have reviewed on this receiver do not include failures due to inadequate heat treatment or steel content. I suspect the moulds are the same previously used by Hesse Arms (now doing business as Vulcan Arms), because the rectangular box with CAI’s information is the same type previously used by Hesse Arms. I suspect that CAI modified the moulds with a new information plate.

CAI FAL receiver review
The feedramp geometry is totally wrong. While some very early Belgium rifles had a single rectangular profile feedramp (called “unibrow” in FAL slang), current production is two distinctive scallop cuts with a high point in the middle. The profile on this receiver isn’t even close and is probably the cause of the frequent failure to chamber malfunctions.

CAI FAL receiver review
CAI uses a full-auto ejector block with a spot of weld to block the auto sear hole. Since the receiver itself isn’t cut for the auto sear, this modification is probably unnecessary. It doesn’t hurt. Note the gap behind the ejector block. Note also the erratic contour of the locking shoulder channel.

CAI FAL receiver review
another view of the weld bead on the full-auto ejector block to prevent use with a safety sear. Since the receiver isn’t cut for the auto sear, this modification, while not causing any problems, seems redundant to me.

CAI FAL receiver review
The relief cuts for the inch pattern dust cover are well done. The locking ledge, however, is a bit too short and not the right angle. The locking ledge angle is critical to a tight lock-up with the tapered locking body in the lower. The walls on the underside of the receiver, only partially visible in this view, are too wide which allows excess lateral play in the upper to lower lockup.

CAI FAL receiver review
The recess for the tab on the front of the magazine is not as wide as on a factory inch pattern. It may be that CAI tried to make it so either inch pattern or metric pattern magazines will fit. On a factory inch pattern receiver, the metric magazine will fit, but since the smaller metric tab does not engage the larger and deeper inch pattern recess, there is no front support for the magazine. While trying to compromise with the recess dimensions may facilitate use with metric magazines, it tends to be too shallow for a new inch pattern magazine – making insertion difficult and straining the magazine feedlips outward.

CAI FAL receiver review
side view of receiver showing correct cut for folding cocking handle. Overall finish is satisfactory. Edges do not have the finer chamfers of a factory receiver.

CAI FAL receiver review
Interesting gouge in ejector block. One of the more common problems with the CAI receiver is the distance from the front to the rear of the magazine well. This can be caused by the ejector block installed too far forward, or the cut for the magazine tab not deep enough, resulting in a magazine that is too tight. The opposite (ejector block too far to the rear) causes bolt-over base misfeeds.

CAI FAL receiver review
Receiver threads. While the threading is adequate, the receiver is missing a tiny recess for the barrel shoulder. This will typically cause barrels to significantly under-time.
Summary
Receiver is dimensionally incorrect, specifically in feedramp geometry, magazine well geometry, and locking shoulder to receiver face dimensions. While some receivers have been built into functioning rifles, the problems are frequent and consistent enough that I will not work on them and I cannot recommend them

Note: I examined a “new” CAI receiver in October 2007. It was of improved finish. The receiver threads were significantly undersize and the hardness of the receiver made chasing the threads with a 1″x16tpi tap very difficult. The rear locking lug was cut incorrectly, 0 degrees instead of correct 10 degree downward slope.

Share
4
Admin
Admin

Related posts

2016-09-29

FAL Review: Coonan, Inc. 2009 FAL Receiver


Read more
2016-09-29

FAL Review: Federal Arms Corporation / DC Industries FAL Receiver


Read more
2016-09-20

FAL Review: Entréprise Arms Inc. FAL Receiver


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


© 2018, T. Mark Graham, Arizona Response Systems, LLC. | All rights reserved. | Developed by Cole Patrick Digital Marketing | Privacy Policy

    0